EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH DATA INSIGHTS
Original Article

Sex Ratio of Live Births Following Fresh Versus Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Invitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Study

Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, 2(2), 2026, ehdi032, https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/18234
Publication date: Mar 25, 2026
Full Text (PDF)

ABSTRACT

Background: Human sex is genetically determined at fertilization; however, emerging evidence suggests that assisted reproductive technologies (ART) may influence the secondary sex ratio (SR). Factors related to parental characteristics, laboratory practices, and embryo handling have been implicated, though findings remain inconsistent. This study aimed to compare the secondary sex ratio of live births following fresh versus frozen–thawed single blastocyst transfer.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study reviewing IVF records from Kingswill Specialist Hospital, Lagos, and referrals to the 68 Nigerian Army Reference Hospital and Lagos University Teaching Hospital. Records from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2025 were assessed. Women who achieved live birth following single blastocyst transfer in either fresh or frozen–thawed IVF cycles were included.
Results: Of 159 records screened, 144 met eligibility criteria and were analyzed (72 fresh and 72 frozen–thawed cycles). Fresh embryo transfer was associated with a higher proportion of male live births compared with frozen–thawed transfer (69.4% vs 45.8%), whereas frozen–thawed cycles yielded a higher proportion of female infants (54.2%).
Conclusion: Fresh single blastocyst embryo transfer was associated with a higher male-to-female live-birth ratio compared with frozen–thawed blastocyst transfer, despite transfer at an equivalent developmental stage. These findings suggest that embryo cryopreservation may be associated with differences in sex ratio following IVF.

KEYWORDS

Sex Ratio Fresh IVF Frozen-Thawed Embryo Maternal Age Body Mass Index

CITATION (Vancouver)

Solomon SO, Issac OS, Ugwu AO, Sunday AA, Magnus NC, Kayode AA. Sex Ratio of Live Births Following Fresh Versus Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Invitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Study. Epidemiology and Health Data Insights. 2026;2(2):ehdi032. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/18234
APA
Solomon, S. O., Issac, O. S., Ugwu, A. O., Sunday, A. A., Magnus, N. C., & Kayode, A. A. (2026). Sex Ratio of Live Births Following Fresh Versus Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Invitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Study. Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, 2(2), ehdi032. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/18234
Harvard
Solomon, S. O., Issac, O. S., Ugwu, A. O., Sunday, A. A., Magnus, N. C., and Kayode, A. A. (2026). Sex Ratio of Live Births Following Fresh Versus Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Invitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Study. Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, 2(2), ehdi032. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/18234
AMA
Solomon SO, Issac OS, Ugwu AO, Sunday AA, Magnus NC, Kayode AA. Sex Ratio of Live Births Following Fresh Versus Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Invitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Study. Epidemiology and Health Data Insights. 2026;2(2), ehdi032. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/18234
Chicago
Solomon, Showunmi Olusheyi, Omisakin Sunday Issac, Aloy Okechukwu Ugwu, Ayeni Abraham Sunday, Nwogu Chidimma Magnus, and Adefemi Ayodeji Kayode. "Sex Ratio of Live Births Following Fresh Versus Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Invitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Study". Epidemiology and Health Data Insights 2026 2 no. 2 (2026): ehdi032. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/18234
MLA
Solomon, Showunmi Olusheyi et al. "Sex Ratio of Live Births Following Fresh Versus Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfer in Invitro Fertilization: A Retrospective Study". Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, vol. 2, no. 2, 2026, ehdi032. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/18234

REFERENCES

  1. Ugwu AO, Makwe CC, Kay V. Analysis of the factors affecting the male-female sex ratio of babies born through assisted reproductive technology. West Afr J Med. 2024;41(7):818–825. PMID: 39357059
  2. James WH, Grech V. A review of the established and suspected causes of variations in human sex ratio at birth. Early Hum Dev. 2017;109:50–56. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.03.002
  3. Kim M, Jeong HC, Baek SK. Sex-ratio bias induced by mutation. Phys Rev E. 2019;99(2):022403. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.99.022403
  4. Douhard M, Geffroy B. Males can adjust offspring sex ratio in an adaptive fashion through different mechanisms. BioEssays. 2021;43(5):2000264. doi:10.1002/bies.202000264
  5. Czech R, Wójcik D, Skweres T, et al. A correlation between the body weight of women undergoing IVF and the gender of offspring. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;46:103420. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103420
  6. James WH, Grech V. The human sex ratio at conception. Early Hum Dev. 2020;140:104862. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.104862
  7. Garg A, de M, Arnal LB, Viloria T, Meseguer M. Comparison of secondary sex ratio between different incubators: is secondary sex ratio improving in ART? Fertil Steril. 2023;120(4):e329–e329. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.942.
  8. Omisakin SI, Ugwu AO, Kusamotu OA, Garba SR, Awoniyi A, Fagbolagun OA, et al. Patterns of Infertility and Prevalence of Bloodborne viruses in Couples seeking assisted conception in Lagos Southwest Nigeria. Journal of IVF-Worldwide. 2025 Feb 10;3(1). https://doi.org/10.46989/001c.129194
  9. Lin PY, Huang FJ, Kung FT. Comparison of the offspring sex ratio between fresh and vitrification-thawed blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1764–1766. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05
  10. Perlman BE, Minis E, Greenberg P, et al. Increased male live-birth rates after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a SART registry study. FS Rep. 2021;2(2):161–165. doi:10.1016/j.xfre.2021.02.008
  11. Shu Y, Su K, Liu G, et al. Sex ratio is significantly skewed in blastocyst transfers and correlated to blastocyst grade. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(4):147–152. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.432
  12. Nagata C, Mekaru K, Gibo K, Nakamura R, et al. Sex ratio of infants born through in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: results of a single-institution study and literature review. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2021;25(3):337–340. doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20200096
  13. You YA, Kwon WS, Rahman MS, et al. Sex chromosome-dependent differential viability of human spermatozoa during prolonged incubation. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(6):1183–1191. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex080
  14. Mao Y, Zeng M, Meng YM, et al. Effect of blastocyst quality on human sex ratio at birth in single blastocyst frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2021 Sep 30. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-929563/v1
  15. Bu Z, Chen ZJ, Huang G, et al. Live birth sex ratio after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in China: an analysis of 121,247 babies from 18 centers. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113522. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113522
  16. Dhiman P, Ma J, Qi C, Bullock G, Sergeant JC, Riley RD, Collins GS. Sample size requirements are not being considered in studies developing prediction models for binary outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023;23(1):188. doi:10.1186/s12874-023-02008-1
  17. Du T, Xie Q, Ye J, Wang X, Qiu J, Yan Z, et al. Factors affecting male-to-female ratio at birth in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a large retrospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol. 2023 Sep 20;14:1188433. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1188433

LICENSE

Creative Commons License
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.