Background: Vaccination is one of the most effective public health interventions yet increasing numbers of unjustified medical exemptions in Kazakhstan threaten both herd immunity and public trust. In 2020 alone, over 208,000 temporary and 2,600 permanent exemptions were issued—often based on questionable clinical criteria. This study aims to explore the drivers behind the rising number of medical exemptions in Kazakhstan, with a particular focus on the perspectives and attitudes of healthcare professionals.
Methods: A qualitative approach was employed, combining a desk review of national immunization policies and statistical reports with 27 in-depth interviews conducted in 2021–2022. Participants included healthcare providers and public health experts across urban and rural regions of Kazakhstan. Thematic analysis was used to identify key patterns in the data. Relevant national regulations were also reviewed and compared with international standards.
Results: Thematic analysis revealed four major areas of concern: (1) inconsistencies in pre-vaccination monitoring practices, (2) variability in post-vaccination follow-up procedures, (3) divergent roles and responsibilities among stakeholders in granting medical exemptions, and (4) limitations in surveillance and data systems for tracking and verifying exemptions. Findings suggest that physician over-cautiousness, legal insecurity, parental pressure, and inconsistent training are key drivers of unnecessary exemptions. The overdiagnosis of precautionary conditions—particularly by specialists such as neurologists—further contributes to false contraindications. These practices erode vaccine confidence and create barriers to timely immunization.
Conclusion: Addressing the growing problem of unwarranted medical exemptions requires policy reform, clearer clinical guidelines, enhanced physician training, and improved digital monitoring systems. Strengthening these areas is essential for restoring public trust, reducing unjustified exemptions, and ensuring high vaccination coverage in Kazakhstan.

Understanding the Rising Trend of Medical Exemptions in Childhood Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives in Kazakhstan
Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, 1(2), 2025, ehdi007, https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/16650
Publication date: Jul 26, 2025
ABSTRACT
KEYWORDS
CITATION (Vancouver)
Mamayev M, Nurgozhayev A, Beissembayev S, Alieva S, Klimchenko A, Gaisina M, et al. Understanding the Rising Trend of Medical Exemptions in Childhood Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives in Kazakhstan. Epidemiology and Health Data Insights. 2025;1(2):ehdi007. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/16650
APA
Mamayev, M., Nurgozhayev, A., Beissembayev, S., Alieva, S., Klimchenko, A., Gaisina, M., & Yergaliyev, K. (2025). Understanding the Rising Trend of Medical Exemptions in Childhood Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives in Kazakhstan. Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, 1(2), ehdi007. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/16650
Harvard
Mamayev, M., Nurgozhayev, A., Beissembayev, S., Alieva, S., Klimchenko, A., Gaisina, M., and Yergaliyev, K. (2025). Understanding the Rising Trend of Medical Exemptions in Childhood Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives in Kazakhstan. Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, 1(2), ehdi007. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/16650
AMA
Mamayev M, Nurgozhayev A, Beissembayev S, et al. Understanding the Rising Trend of Medical Exemptions in Childhood Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives in Kazakhstan. Epidemiology and Health Data Insights. 2025;1(2), ehdi007. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/16650
Chicago
Mamayev, Marat, Ali Nurgozhayev, Serik Beissembayev, Saule Alieva, Anna Klimchenko, Mereilim Gaisina, and Kuanysh Yergaliyev. "Understanding the Rising Trend of Medical Exemptions in Childhood Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives in Kazakhstan". Epidemiology and Health Data Insights 2025 1 no. 2 (2025): ehdi007. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/16650
MLA
Mamayev, Marat et al. "Understanding the Rising Trend of Medical Exemptions in Childhood Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Providers’ Perspectives in Kazakhstan". Epidemiology and Health Data Insights, vol. 1, no. 2, 2025, ehdi007. https://doi.org/10.63946/ehdi/16650
REFERENCES
- World Health Organization. Vaccines and immunization [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2023 [cited 2025 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/vaccines-and-immunization
- Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Coverage of children with preventive vaccinations [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jun 8]. Available from: https://bala.stat.gov.kz/ohvat-detej-profilakticheskimi-privivkami/
- Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Measles in Kazakhstan: review of the healthcare system and root cause analysis of the 2019-2020 outbreak. Nur-Sultan: Ministry of Healthcare; 2020.
- Gromis A, Liu KY. Spatial Clustering of Vaccine Exemptions on the Risk of a Measles Outbreak. Pediatrics. 2022;149(1). DOI: 10.1542/peds.2021-050971
- Yap WK, Attwell K. Medical exemptions to mandatory vaccinations: The state of play in Australia and a pressure point to watch. Epidemiol Infect. 2024;152:e40. DOI: 10.1017/S0950268824000268
- Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation. Medical contraindications for preventive vaccinations under the national immunization schedule: Methodological guidelines (MU 3.3.1.1095-02). Moscow: Federal Center for State Sanitary and Epidemiological Surveillance; 2002.
- Berry NJ, Henry A, Danchin M, Trevena L, Willaby HW, Leask J. When parents won't vaccinate their children: a qualitative investigation of australian primary care providers' experiences. BMC Pediatr. 2017;17:19. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-017-0783-2
- Lin C, Mullen J, Smith D, Kotarba M, Kaplan SJ, Tu P. Healthcare Providers' Vaccine Perceptions, Hesitancy, and Recommendation to Patients: A Systematic Review. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(7):713. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9070713
- Tankwanchi AS, Jaca A, Larson HJ, Wiysonge CS, Vermund SH. Taking stock of vaccine hesitancy among migrants: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10(5):e035225. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035225
- The Lancet Child Adolescent Health. Vaccine hesitancy: a generation at risk. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019;3(5):281. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30092-6
- World Health Organization. New WHO study shows health workers feel more confident to recommend COVID-19 vaccination following a training on patient communication [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Europe; 2023 [cited 2025 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/europe/news/item/24-05-2023-new-who-study-shows-health-workers-feel-more-confident-to-recommend-covid-19-vaccination-following-a-training-on-patient-communication
- MacDonald NE; SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy: definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015;33(34):4161-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036
- UNICEF Kazakhstan, USAID, BRIF Research Group. Behavior insights research on drivers influencing immunization-related behaviours in Kazakhstan. Astana: UNICEF; 2023. 174 p.
- UNICEF. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) survey on childhood immunization in Kazakhstan. Nur-Sultan: The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) in the Republic of Kazakhstan; 2021.
- Rivero I, Raguindin PF, Buttler R, Martinon-Torres F. False Vaccine Contraindications Among Healthcare Providers in Europe: A Short Survey Among Members of The European Society of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019;38(9):974-6. DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002401
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Immunization strategies for healthcare practices and providers. In: Epidemiology and prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2021.
- Badur S, Ota M, Öztürk S, Adegbola R, Dutta A. Vaccine confidence: the keys to restoring trust. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(5):1007-17. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1740559
- Shah RR. Importance of Publishing Adverse Drug Reaction Case Reports: Promoting Public Health and Advancing Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Drug Saf Case Rep. 2017;4(1):11. DOI: 10.1007/s40800-017-0053-0
- Hodel KVS, Fiuza BSD, Conceição RS, Aleluia ACM, Pitanga TN, Fonseca LMDS, et al. Pharmacovigilance in Vaccines: Importance, Main Aspects, Perspectives, and Challenges-A Narrative Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17(6):807. DOI: 10.3390/ph17060807
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- UNICEF. Preliminary analysis of vaccination curricula in medical educational institutions of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2020.
- Sarybay U, Kabibolla S, Adilmetova G, Nassyrov R, Meyerbekova A, Sarría-Santamera A, et al. Level of nutrition competencies among healthcare professionals and medical students in Kazakhstan. BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2025. DOI: 10.1136/bmjnph-2024-000972
- Zimmerman RK, Schlesselman JJ, Mieczkowski TA, Medsger AR, Raymund M. Physician concerns about vaccine adverse effects and potential litigation. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(1):12-9. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.152.1.12
- Healy CM, Montesinos DP, Middleman AB. Parent and provider perspectives on immunization: are providers overestimating parental concerns? Vaccine. 2014;32(5):579-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.076
- Salmon DA, Pan WK, Omer SB, Navar AM, Orenstein W, Marcuse EK, et al. Vaccine knowledge and practices of primary care providers of exempt vs. vaccinated children. Hum Vaccin. 2008;4(4):286-91. DOI: 10.4161/hv.4.4.5752
- Uttekar S, MacDonald N, Orenstein WA, Danchin M, Blaser V, Thomson A, et al. Empowering Health Workers to Build Public Trust in Vaccination: Experience from the International Pediatric Association's Online Vaccine Trust Course, 2020-2021. Vaccine. 2023;41(2):435-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.061
- Wennekes MD, Almási T, Eilers R, Mezei F, Petykó ZI, Timen A, et al. Effectiveness of educational interventions for healthcare workers on vaccination dialogue with older adults: a systematic review. Arch Public Health. 2024;82(1):34. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01260-1
- Doucette EJ, Fullerton MM, Pateman M, Lip A, Houle SKD, Kellner JD, et al. Development and evaluation of virtual simulation games to increase the confidence and self-efficacy of healthcare learners in vaccine communication, advocacy, and promotion. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):190. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05169-9
- Hoogink J, Verelst F, Kessels R, van Hoek AJ, Timen A, Willem L, et al. Preferential differences in vaccination decision-making for oneself or one's child in The Netherlands: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):828. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-08844-w
- Secor AM, Mtenga H, Richard J, Bulula N, Ferriss E, Rathod M, et al. Added Value of Electronic Immunization Registries in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Observational Case Study in Tanzania. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8(1):e32455. DOI: 10.2196/32455
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. National Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI) Surveillance and Response Operational Guidelines - 2024 [Internet]. New Delhi: MoHFW; 2024 [cited 2025 Jun 8]. Available from: https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/National%20AEFI%20Surveillance%20and%20Response%20Operational%20Guidelines%202024.pdf
- Zhakhina G, Mussina K, Yerdessov S, Gusmanov A, Sakko Y, Kim V, et al. Analysis of chronic kidney disease epidemiology in Kazakhstan using nationwide data for 2014-2020 and forecasting future trends of prevalence and mortality for 2030. Ren Fail. 2024;46(1):2326312. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2326312
- Public Health Agency of Canada. Reporting adverse events following immunization (AEFI) in Canada: user guide to completion and submission of the AEFI reports [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Public Health Agency of Canada; 2025 Feb [cited 2025 Jun 8]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/immunization/reporting-adverse-events-following-immunization/user-guide-completion-submission-aefi-reports.html
- McGoldrick M, Gastineau T, Wilkinson D, Campa C, Clercq N, Mallia-Milanes A, et al. How to accelerate the supply of vaccines to all populations worldwide? Part I: Initial industry lessons learned and practical overarching proposals leveraging the COVID-19 situation. Vaccine. 2022;40(9):1215-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.098
- Buttery JP, Clothier H. Information systems for vaccine safety surveillance. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(6):2100173. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2100173
- Shragai T, Adegoke OJ, Ikwe H, Sorungbe T, Haruna A, Williams I, et al. Implementation of data triangulation and dashboard development for COVID-19 vaccine adverse event following immunisation (AEFI) data in Nigeria. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8(1):e011006. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011006
- Sankar C, Meyer JC, Schönfeldt M, Gunter H, Dawood H, Sekiti V, et al. Vaccine safety surveillance in South Africa through COVID-19: A journey to systems strengthening. Vaccine. 2025;46:126535. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126535
- Lv H, Pan X, Wang Y, Liang H, Yu H. Barriers to healthcare workers reporting adverse events following immunization in Zhejiang province, China. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(5):2083865. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2083865
- Wegwarth O, Hertwig R, Giese H, Fineberg HV. The impact of nontransparent health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine-hesitant people's perception of vaccines. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1256829. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256829
- Petersen MB, Bor A, Jørgensen F, Lindholt MF. Transparent communication about negative features of COVID-19 vaccines decreases acceptance but increases trust. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(29). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2024597118
LICENSE

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.